Does 'The Anxious Generation' Apply to New Zealand?

Jonathan Haidt’s The Anxious Generation argues that a shift from “play-based” to “phone-based” childhood has led to a sharp rise in anxiety, depression, and disconnection among teens. But how well does that argument hold up in Aotearoa New Zealand?

Here’s a breakdown — what fits, what doesn’t, and what might matter more here at home.


Does the crisis exist here?
✅ Yes — possibly even more severely than in the US.

  • Suicide is the leading cause of death for young people in New Zealand.
  • NZ has among the highest youth suicide rates in the OECD.
  • Youth mental distress nearly doubled between 2012–2019 (Youth2000 data).
  • Young women are especially affected — anxiety, depression, and self-harm are on the rise.

📌 This strongly aligns with Haidt’s central concern.


Do Kiwi kids have early, unrestricted access?
✅ Increasingly, yes.

  • Most NZ teens own a smartphone by age 12 or younger.
  • Social media use (Snapchat, TikTok, Discord) begins early — often before official age limits.
  • Netsafe reports show near-universal access in higher decile schools, with access rising across the board.

What’s different:

  • Inconsistent parental boundaries
  • Wide variation between schools — some ban phones, others embed them in learning

📌 Haidt’s concern maps well here, though regulation is patchier.


Are we overprotecting offline and underprotecting online?
⚠️ Mixed.

  • NZ still has strong outdoor culture — bikes, trampolines, bush play, etc.
  • But in urban and lower-income areas, screens are often the default due to safety concerns or lack of space.
  • Urban sprawl and traffic have also reduced safe, independent movement.

📌 Haidt’s theory fits best in urban NZ — less so in rural communities.


Does Haidt account for bicultural or multi-ethnic experiences?
❌ Not at all.

  • Māori and Pasifika youth experience systemic racism, trauma, and economic hardship.
  • Mental health challenges are often linked to disconnection from culture, colonisation, and housing insecurity — not just screens.
  • The hauora model of wellbeing (physical, mental, spiritual, family) offers a richer, more holistic framework.

📌 Haidt’s book is too monocultural to fully address NZ’s youth experience.


Has NZ responded effectively?
⚠️ Inconsistently.

  • Schools have banned phones during class or breaks.
  • Most promote BYOD and expect daily device use.
  • The Ministry promotes digital literacy — but there’s no nationwide digital wellbeing or critical thinking curriculum.

📌 Haidt would likely say we’re underdoing it — and he’d be right.


Does Haidt’s model apply equally across NZ?
No — access is uneven.

  • Rural teens often deal with spotty coverage or limited bandwidth.
  • Low-income families may share devices or rely on prepaid data.
  • In some cases, online support is the only support available.

📌 A universal “no phone before 16” policy might hurt the very kids who need support the most.


Haidt ClaimNZ RealityAssessment
Youth mental health crisis✅ YesStrong alignment
Smartphones/social media are a root cause✅ Partial causeContributing, not sole factor
Girls are more affected✅ Especially with self-harmMatches
Overprotective parenting + screen overuse⚠️ VariesUrban fit, rural less so
Screen bans are needed❌ Context mattersBlanket bans don’t work here
Need for digital discernment✅ YesOpportunity for schools and whānau

The Anxious Generation is a useful wake-up call — and much of it applies in Aotearoa.

But we also need to:

  • Bring in cultural context — especially Māori and Pasifika perspectives
  • Recognise digital inequity across class and region
  • Focus less on bans, and more on critical thinking, offline resilience, and stronger support networks

In short: connection isn’t the enemy — but discernment is survival.

Let’s raise kids who are not just connected — but digitally strong, culturally grounded, and mentally well.